New details have been revealed from the arrest warrants issued by SPAK for 4 officials of the Municipality of Dimal and an economist (manager of a commercial company) and an engineer at a commercial company.
Sources indicate that the investigations into this issue started in November 2020 from the complaint of a citizen with the initials PB. In the complaint, the citizen accuses the employees of the Municipality of Dimal, that they have damaged the business established on a public property which he owned since the beginning of the 90's with the excuse that a flower garden would be built, but according to him, after the demolition, the property was transferred to him another citizen.
Further in the report, it is said that in that place, a building has started to be built, which according to the report is also private and not the flower garden that was announced. The works for flower gardens by the Municipality did not aim to expand public spaces, but to favor the other person, with whom the complainant admits that there was an ownership conflict. After nearly 2 years of investigations on this matter, this Tuesday SPAK issued 6 arrest warrants.
From the in-depth investigations SPAK, in addition to the case reported by the citizen PB, has discovered many other episodes of corruption committed by the officials of the Dimal municipality. Referring to sources from the anti-corruption structure, it is learned that these citizens are accused of allowing various citizens to carry out constructions and constructions, mainly in the Dimal area, in exchange for monetary amounts ranging from 2,500 euros to 3,000 euros.
The former head of transport in the municipality of Dimal Arben Gurraj, the director of the Urban Planning office Altin Pali and the head of IKMT Agim Çunaj ended up in handcuffs. Likewise, the municipal engineer Arjan Demiri and the economists Vajet Kushi and Valntina Jançe ended up in handcuffs, the latter under the "House Arrest" security measure.
They are accused of the criminal offenses "Passive corruption of persons exercising public functions", "Exercising illegal influence on persons exercising public functions" and "Abuse of office".