
Arben Ahmetaj escaped from the handcuffs by escaping from Albania on the same day that SPAK signed the request for the removal of immunity, which he then sent to the Parliament on Monday. In the long public message on social networks, Ahmetaj says that his departure has nothing to do with the letter from SPAK, that he left without the letter arriving at SPAK and other alibi like these.
But could it be that he left on the same day that SPAK requested his arrest, or did the former minister receive information from within the special structure of the prosecution?
This question must be answered by the special prosecution, just as it must be answered as to why it delayed the request for the removal of his immunity for so long. SPAK officially took Arben Ahmetaj under investigation in the middle of March. This means that it took the prosecution four months to realize that Arben Ahmetaj was corrupt and seek his arrest.
How deep the evidence of Arben Ahmetaj's corruption went was shown in Inside Story's 'Korrupsioni i Ahmetaj' show at the beginning of February, one month before SPAK officially took him under investigation and five months before requesting his arrest. his.
This was all the necessary time for Arben Ahmetaj to destroy the evidence, intimidate the witnesses and finally, before trying the handcuffs and escaping. All the majesty of SPAK when it comes to Arben Ahmetaj cannot be said for other cases.
After failing to handcuff the former Minister of Finance, the special prosecutor's office is preparing to arrest the ringleaders involved in Ahmetaj's corrupt affairs. It is about at least 17 persons who are in the file of SPAK, but who all have a peripheral role in the corrupt affairs where Arben Ahmetaj is their mastermind.
Issuance of arrest warrants for these persons is considered a matter of days now, raising moral doubts about the standards of action of SPAK, which has sharks of corruption, such as Arben Ahmetaj, running under its nose and catching the threads of his affairs in the net.
© Copyright Vox News
This article is exclusive to Vox News, it is copyrighted according to Law No. 35/2016, "On copyright and related rights". The article can be republished by other media only by citing Vox News and placing the source link at the end, otherwise any violator will be held responsible according to Article 178 of Law No. 35/2016