Instead of the barren debate on the mandate of SPAK prosecutors, think...

Nga Ylli Manjani

Since the debate resumes, whether or not the mandate of SPAK prosecutors is extended, my invitation to any particibis in this debate is to think in these terms:

1. The possibility of arrest is limited, only in extreme conditions of public safety and/or where other measures have not given effect to the person;

2. Use as means test for test research is not allowed. So surveillance and controls, even when they are not abusive, are not evidence but means of getting to the test;

3. Criminal proceedings on anonymous and/or political whistleblowers are not allowed. At least not without verifications of the truth in the denusified facts and motives of the denouncer;

4. Housing controls and wiretapping are allowed only in extreme need and only justified for the need of concrete investigation and, not in vain for pleasure or competence;

5. The Penal Code imposes proportional sentences and in harmony with the West. It makes no sense that in the place where drugs are sold you are punished little or by a fine, while in the country where its seller is sentenced to a lot of prison.

6. Anti-Mafia law forbids to presume a large mass of Albanians as mafiosi. The process of acquiring property is related only to the criminal offense from which the property came from, not with rumors and indicies;

7. Courts are freed from any influence from SPAK, until we move towards closing special courts to go to ordinary courts;

8. The SPAK's injury competence is limited, according to the Italian antimafia model;

Let's do it and let the current prosecutors stay in office. America loves them, no problem.

I assure you that undertatweening these steps would de-strain the idiotic public debate and, it would give way to a necessary state normalcy.

I am convinced that if these things are done, the media that sits there at the door of SPAK will leave and justice will enter normalcy.

The law is not in the courts, but in the courts of the courts, and the courts are in the courts.

Who is the most important, the prosecutors' mandate or the system they work in?

Here's the point!

Or at least that's how I see it.