Almost a month from the day when Arben Ahmetaj was officially charged by SPAK for his involvement in the incinerators file, there is not only no action, but also no sign from SPAK regarding the progress of the investigations.
The Special Prosecutor's Office has not only not issued a statement regarding the progress of the investigations, but has not publicly questioned the accused former deputy prime minister .
The first procedural step that SPAK had to take after the formalization of the charge was to send to the Assembly the request for the removal of the MP's immunity for him.
Voxnews.al learns that no such request has officially reached the Assembly, even though the special courts have given the right to SPAK for the legality of the control operations in the villa in Gjirin e Lalzi, on behalf of the partner of Arben Ahmetaj and that of Palasa on behalf of his ex-wife.
Why is the procedural request being delayed?
Only the prosecutors of the file, i.e. Altin Duman i and Enkeleida Millonai, know the reasons. What the public knows at this stage of the investigation is that Arben Ahmetaj has been charged with corruption, abuse of office and laundering the proceeds of the crime.
The accusations were raised after SPAK checks in the villa of Arben Ahmetaj 's current partner , Arjola Hoxha , and his ex-wife, Albina Mançka .
Both controls were opposed by Ahmetaj, who requested their invalidity in court, not on the basis of the suspicions and then the charges brought against him, but with the claim that the MP's immunity protected him from these controls.
The entire silence of SPAK using the election campaign suggests that it is deliberate. The evidence of Arben Ahmetaj's corruption has been sealed today with the decisions of special courts, which legitimized the controls and took him as a defendant.
© Copyright Vox News
This article is exclusive to Vox News, it is copyrighted according to Law No. 35/2016, "On copyright and related rights". The article can be republished by other media only by citing Vox News and placing the source link at the end, otherwise any violator will be held responsible according to Article 178 of Law No. 35/2016.