A suspected corrupt tender for the time he ran the Municipality of Kavaja, brought Elvis Roshin to the Special Court .
The fate of the investigation and his trial is currently in the hands of judge Rudina Palloj , who has been drawn to decide on the request of the Durrës Prosecutor's Office to close the investigation.
The latter had earlier addressed the Court of the coastal city with the same request, but Judge Sokol Mara declared incompetence, handing it over to GJKKO for decision-making.
The prosecutor of Durrës, Gëzim Çopa, must now argue the request for the suspension of investigations before the black squads against Corruption and Organized Crime in Tirana .
The criminal procedure was registered after the High State Control, after an audit in the Municipality of Kavaja, identified violations by filing a report.
The procedure was registered on July 31, 2017, for abuse of duty and violation of equality in tenders. Regarding the first session at the GJKKO, where the latter must express whether it opens the way for the investigation by SPAK or accepts the request of the prosecution of Durrës for the suspension of the investigation, it did not take place.
The prosecutor of Durrës did not appear because he was participating in a session for setting security measures, thus setting another date.
From SPAK, representative of the charge is Elvin Gokaj, who will have to wait for the decision of GJKKO which, if it rejects the request of the Durrës Prosecutor's Office, opens the way for SPAK to continue the investigations on the claims of KLSH for two crimes criminal cases that are suspected to have been consumed by the former socialist mayor and that are related to a tender for the cleaning of the city.
" The latter, in implementation of the audit program no. 258 prot. dated 16.03.2017, and addendum no. 249/2 prot. approved by the Chairman of the SSC, has performed the audit on financial regularity and compliance in the Municipality of Kavaje, for the period 01.01.2015-31.12.2016 and for the former municipalities, transferred to the administration of this Municipality, for the period from 01.01.2013 to 31.07.2015.
According to the reporting party, serious violations of legal and by-law provisions in the field of public procurement were found from the audit.
For this reason, the High State Control has addressed to the Prosecutor's Office of the Kavaje Judicial District, through letter no. 258/14, dated 27.07.2017, with the subject "Indications for criminal prosecution on the violations found by the Kavaje Municipality ".
From here, according to the reporting party, it results that: i) In the procurement procedure with the object "city cleaning service" developed on 15.02.2016, with a limited fund of 147,519,416 lek (without VAT), the holder of the Contracting Authority, Mr. Elvis Rroshi has approved the procedure and the summary report of the KVO, as well as announced the public procurement and the demands of the LPP.
Specifically: winner EO "Alko Impeks Genaral Construction" LLC, contrary to the rules of EO "Ekologica Albanta" LLC, which has only one shortcoming, the lack of technical control of a vehicle, but with the lowest economic offer value (127,500,526 ALL ) and EO "Alko Impeks Genaral Construction" LLC, which for two vehicles has not presented the circulation permit, does not certify that it has performed the technical inspection and insurance of the vehicles, does not certify that it has paid the obligations for local taxes in the state of Kosovo, does not submitted declarations that this form is not applicable in the state of Kosovo, has the highest economic offer (139,746,161 lek).
The holder of the Contracting Authority, Mr. Elvis Rroshi, has announced the winner of EO "Alko Impeks Genaral Construction" LLC, with more deficiencies and the highest bid. As a result, public funds were not used properly, with a total value of 12,245,635 lek", the investigative material states.
A year ago, Elvis Roshi was called to the Special Prosecutor's Office where he testified as a person with knowledge of the case for which investigations were being carried out. When a year has passed, the issue that was asked about and what was the fate of this proceeding has not yet been clarified.