OPEN LETTER/ Come to the dialogue and listen to me speak, otherwise I will cut off your scholarships, you will rot in prison. Please!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

Shënjestra escaped prison/ Two contradictory decisions that freed Fatjon Murat

2023-03-13 18:26:33Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Shënjestra escaped prison/ Two contradictory decisions that freed Fatjon
Fatjon Murat

They are investigated with great fanfare and amnestied in silence. This is the next precedent of the failure of the police, the prosecution and the Albanian courts with the suspect Fatjon Murat, who was the target of a bloody assassination, where six people were injured and a seventh was killed.

In the files available to Tch, it is shown how for the suspect Fatjon Murati, assets were seized as he was suspected of being part of a criminal organization. The decision was announced at the same time when he was handcuffed for carrying weapons without a permit, after the police had discovered weapon bases in the apartments rented by Kristian Gjini.

Fatjon Murati was betrayed by a fingerprint, left on a handbag, inside which was a Ruger 57 pistol with erased numbers. Judge Migena Laska found the suspicions to be well-founded and added that this citizen represents significant social danger.

In this decision dated October 11, 2022, the judge sentenced Murat to prison, on the grounds that he can avoid the investigation and there are also doubts that the 32-year-old will influence and damage the evidence. But three months later, the documents show that everything changed in Murat's favor.

Unlike the first position in the second, the court considers the same circumstances to be fragile, and unclear despite the fact that in the meantime on December 13, Fatjon Murat was charged with being retrained, but it was still illegal possession of weapons.

It is the same judge who on December 28, 2022 ordered the annulment of the first decision and sent Murat to house arrest on the grounds that he should stay close to his elderly mother and that the evidence was not convincing.

The court says that the special dangerousness of the person under investigation is not proven and that the seized weapon did not show that shootings were committed for criminal events, thus maintaining an openly lenient attitude for a person for whom the institutions considered him dangerous. face to face, but not in decisions./Tch


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×