Rama said that legislation will be intervened to suspend a minister, Bardhi: He is protecting his corrupt power!

2026-02-09 13:12:25Politikë SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Gazmend Bardhi/ Belinda Balluku

The Chairman of the DP Parliamentary Group, Gazment Bardhi, in his latest reaction on social networks emphasized that Prime Minister Edi Rama's intervention in an active investigation is an open attempt to obstruct justice and protect his corrupt government.

Bardhi highlighted three important truths related to changing the law in the middle of an investigation and the merging of the two branches of government to overturn court decisions, emphasizing that these actions constitute organized pressure on justice.

According to him, Rama is using politics to protect himself and avoid the consequences of the investigation.

The Rise of Gazment Bardhi:

3 truths about Rama's interference in an active investigation:

1. When a Prime Minister changes the law while his closest associate is being investigated, he is not defending any constitutional or legal principle. He is defending his own corrupt power. The rules are not changed in the middle of an investigation to save himself.

2. When the Government and the Parliament join forces to strike down the decision of two courts regarding an active criminal investigation, we have two powers trying to influence the third. This is not separation of powers. It is organized pressure against justice.

3. When it is said that there is "no urgency" to SPAK's request for the arrest of Belinda Balluku, the message is clear: Justice must wait. The government needs to buy time.

Suspension from exercising public office is not an invention of SPAK. It is written in the Criminal Procedure Code. It applies to every public official.

For minister. For deputy prime minister. For prime minister.

When the legal conditions exist, anyone can be suspended, because suspension does not paralyze the state. It only paralyzes the person under investigation to avoid influence through the function.

Arrest is required when the investigation is jeopardized through witness intimidation or tampering with evidence. SPAK has provided evidence that these risks are concrete in the case of Belinda Balluku. So, there are two parallel measures. One protects the criminal process, the other protects the institution. 

To confuse them, as Edi Rama does, is a distortion of the truth with the aim of obstructing justice.

The law is clear. It cannot be changed because it affects power.

The Mandates Council must convene without excuses, without artificial postponements, without political maneuvers. The Speaker of the Assembly must choose: either on the side of the law, or on the side of obstruction of justice.


Video