DREAM / The Prime Minister resigns and wakes up under the Parisian bridge!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

Journalist Hasani: Çim Peka's clash with Mirel Mërtir was a violation of ethics

2023-12-19 16:06:46Pikëpamje SHKRUAR NGA HABJON HASANI
Journalist Hasani: Çim Peka's clash with Mirel Mërtir was a
Mirel Mertiri / Çim Peka

The first public interview of Mirel Mërtiri yesterday evening on the show of journalist Çim Peka was expected by many to make waves in public opinion, but a day later, many think that it was actually a "fiasco".

Journalist Habjon Hasani commented on how this interview was conducted, why it failed to produce sensitive news and what moderator Çim Peka did wrong.

Hasani is of the opinion that the journalist Peka took a "political-clan" position but also prejudiced against the guest, conducting an interview in violation of ethics.

The full comment of journalist Habjon Hasani:

Some milestones on Mirel Mërtir's last night's show.

Mqs and Mr. Peka said today that it was the only way to close the show, and according to him those who are concerned about ethics should first of all be concerned about the looted money, I am listing the reasons why I think what Peka has done is not it was only a violation of ethics, but political and clan positioning, in addition to arbitrary incompetence in managing a golden opportunity for a scoop.

a) At the moment when the subject is in Skype connection, you must define protocol and working order to absolutely guarantee his right to feel equal with the members in the studio.

This protocol is the direct responsibility of the moderator, who must instruct and studio guests to follow only his signal to intervene.

b) Mirel Mërtiri repeated 7 times that he was a project director, but the moderator told him that you are neither the owner nor the director, can we know what you are. This shows that the moderator does not listen and has no interest in exploring the subject, but is totally prejudiced against it. A mistake that directly hits the reputation of the moderator who does not know where he is and why he is there.

c) The moderator did not know the case and had not combed through the documents that had been made available to him, repeatedly confusing indicia with the proven fact.

d) The moderator completely sided with Mertiri's accusers, this is inadmissible. You can say that you are accused of X thing by Y person, but don't say explain to me how you stole these so that X accuses you. You are a party if you do this, the moment you are a party and appear as a party, you leave the field free for the other person to nail you.

e) The moderator told the subject that he could not use his studio for his own interests, or to make his game. This is stratospheric bullshit, because it's like telling a chess player that you can't use my chessboard to beat me. Of course he is there to defeat you, it is your duty to prevent him and win, but to win by the rules of the game, not by overturning the chess box.

f) When Mertiri said that he would not mention names, he should have been asked immediately if he had misunderstood the interview. Having been invited as a businessman who had won public contracts signed by public officials, he was not invited as a philosopher who would discuss sublime theoretical ideas and principles.

g) No attempt was made to ask the "shah-she-torre" subject, of type:

-If you could turn back time, what would you do differently?

- Did you regret putting your wife's name as the owner of the Albtek entity?

-What did you think when you learned that Arben Ahmetaj's Blackberry phone was seized? Do you remember those conversations? What were you saying brother? How did he feel when you talked to him pet?

Apparently, they are naive questions, but they are questions that place the subject in a position of reflection and mutual trust, and they are questions that can bring out pearls.

h) Lastly, the Syri.net moderator's claim that those who emphasize ethics ignore theft is untrue, because everyone owes ethics and professionalism to themselves and then to the state budget.

In addition to this, a question naturally arises:

Is moderator Peka so outraged about the contracts received by other businessmen such as Shefqet Kastrati, Samir Mane, Artan Dulaku, etc.?

Does he have the same sensitivity as in the case of Martyr?

The answer to this elementary question is the arithmetic proof of the fact that the moderator was not only a political party, clannish and biased, but above all, the mind lies that the impossibility to break down this "golden bird" that fell into his hands, comes from others.

No friend, there you had the bird, you had to flirt with him and make him tweet for you, this is your duty, it is the duty of the Minister of Finance to protect the budget, not you.


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×