DREAM / The Prime Minister resigns and wakes up under the Parisian bridge!

 Kliko këtu për të tjera
Voxpress:

Plarent Ndreca evaluates the decision of judge Denis Frroku: Justice should speak with the law, not with a punitive instinct!

2025-12-23 14:05:47Aktualitet SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Plarent Ndreca evaluates the decision of judge Denis Frroku: Justice should
Plarent Ndreca

Lawyer Plarent Ndreca has reacted to a judicial reasoning given by Judge Denis Frroku , describing it as a clear example of the fair functioning of the court in a state governed by the rule of law.

In his reaction, Ndreca emphasizes that, despite not personally knowing Judge Frroku and having no other connection than reading the reasoning of the decision, this case deserves to be publicly applauded.

According to him, far from media pressure and public outcry, such decisions demonstrate a standard of professionalism and real independence in the justice system.

Plarent Ndreca evaluates the decision of judge Denis Frroku: Justice should
Judge Denis Frroku's decision

Ndreca underlines that the security measure should not be perceived as a punishment or as a means to facilitate the work of the prosecution, but as a temporary restriction of freedom, justified only by the concrete needs of the investigation and within the strict criteria provided for by law.

"This is respect for the presumption of innocence and constitutional justice in practice," he says, adding that society is used to talking, rightly, about wrong decisions, but it is equally important to promote decisions and judges that demonstrate standards, professionalism, and integrity.

According to Ndreca, justice is not only strengthened through criticism, but also by highlighting positive models that should be followed, as a way to build trust and consolidate the rule of law.

Plarent Ndreca's regime:

When justice speaks with law, not with punitive instinct

This reasoning by Judge Denis Frroku is a clear example of how the court should function in a state governed by the rule of law.

Without knowing him personally, away from the blinding spotlight of the media, in a court without public noise, an unknown face, and with no connection other than reading this reasoning, I think such decisions should be publicly applauded.

Because: the security measure is not a punishment; it is not a means to "make the work easier" for the prosecution; but a temporary restriction of freedom, justified only by the concrete need of the investigation, within the strict criteria of the law.

This is constitutional justice. This is respect for the presumption of innocence.

We are used to talking, rightly, about wrong decisions. But it is equally important to promote judges and reasoning that demonstrate standards, professionalism, and real independence.

Justice is not only strengthened by criticism. It is also strengthened by highlighting models that should be followed.


Në përputhje me standarded JTI

Video

SHIKO KANALIN NE YOUTUBE
×