
Sali Berisha claims that the US has removed his "non grata" status.
At the moment, there is no official announcement and it is said that we are only dealing with an American tolerance, that Berisha can travel to the US, but that's all.
Let's take it for granted for a moment that Sali Berisha's "non grata" has fallen.
This would be a major political victory for the leader of the Democratic Party, who has been seeking to remove this "stain" from his life for five years.
But it would also be a moment of reflection for him, not just joy.
If the "non grata" has fallen, is it worth it for him to continue in politics, when the reason why he returned to the leadership of the DP was precisely the battle to undo the "non grata"?
Isn't it time for him to step down now with "honor" and liberate the DP?
This, because if he did, it would be a great advantage for the DP, but also a serious blow to the SP and mainly to Edi Rama, at this delicate moment for him, when thousands of people have taken to the streets to protest.
Berisha's departure would leave Edi Rama alone in the face of protesters, who demand not only his removal, but also that of the leader of the Democratic Party.
With the departure of Berisha and the entire old political elite, most of whom are now in prison or under investigation by SPAK, starting with Meta and so on, Rama would be the only one in the game from the "old guard."
And all the anger of the protesters would be poured out on him.
The ending is then known!
But can Berisha do this, so that with his departure, he can "kill" Edi Rama as well?
Of course not.
First, that "non grata" has not been dropped and he knows this very well.
And second, his biggest problem now is not "non grata", but justice.
That's why he can't leave politics and the DP, as he needs it to protect himself and his family!
Fortunately for Rama, of course!
©Copyright Vox News
This article is exclusive to Vox News, and is copyrighted under Law No. 35/2016, "On Copyright and Related Rights". The article may be republished by other media only by citing Vox News and including a link to the source at the end, otherwise any violator will be held liable under Article 178 of Law No. 35/2016.