Hide connections with traffickers in Vetting/ Should ILD investigations be launched against the prosecutor of SPAK, Nakuçi?

2023-03-14 19:07:13Fokus SHKRUAR NGA REDAKSIA VOX
Eneid Nakuçi

The High Inspectorate of Justice, the body that by law has the role of observing and punishing prosecutors and judges who violate the law, neither affirms nor denies at the moment whether it has launched an investigation against the special prosecutor, Eneid Nakuçi.

There is a criminal complaint against the prosecutor for hiding evidence during the investigation of the Elbasan incinerator file. According to the complaint, the concealment was done to protect Arben Ahmetaj from justice.

This is one of the suspected violations that weigh on the biography of prosecutor Eneid Nakuçi. The other, which is even more serious, is related to the Spirit file. Two are the names of the prosecutors that are mentioned in the testimony given before the Italian anti-mafia of Mariglen Shusha, the penitent of the file. The first is the prosecutor of Vlora at that time, Mariglen Shusha, and the second, the prosecutor of serious crimes, at that time, Eneid Nakuçi.

According to the testimony given by Mariglen Shusha, the prosecutor of SPAK is mentioned as the name with which the traffickers should contact in order to influence the Justice. Shusha says that the other investigator in this file, Ilirjan Duçkollari, has spent 200 thousand euros to close the file, the same file that Nakuçi registered the proceedings in November 2015, in January 2016 Robert Myftari was charged and on July 10, 2017, suspended with the argument of lack of evidence.

The investigation into this file was mentioned to Nakuçi when he was vetted by ONM experts. Despite this, he passed the reassessment and was then appointed to SPAK as a special prosecutor.

But is vetting a foolproof process? There can be plenty of examples to prove the opposite, but the most important is that of Luan Daci. The latter not only passed the re-evaluation process, but was subsequently appointed as a judge in the Special Appellate Panel.

He held this post until he ended up in SPAK himself, denounced for concealing a disciplinary decision from 20 years ago. The parallel in this case with Nakuçi is the fact denounced in Inside Story, where Nakuçi's name is mentioned in the Spirit file of the Italian side, but does not appear in the Albanian translation of this file.

Hide connections with traffickers in Vetting/ Should ILD investigations be
The file of the Italian prosecution

These are the evidence and indications that are also in the hands of the High Inspectorate of Justice, that if the investigation of suspected violations within SPAK is not a priority, then we cannot say what other priority it has.

© Copyright Vox News

This article is exclusive to Vox News, it is copyrighted according to Law No. 35/2016, "On copyright and related rights". The article can be republished by other media only by citing Vox News and placing the source link at the end, otherwise any violator will be held responsible according to Article 178 of Law No. 35/2016.

Video